Thursday, October 20, 2011

HOW TO SURVIVE A HEART ATTACK WHEN ALONE


HOW TO SURVIVE A HEART ATTACK WHEN ALONE


Since many people are alone when they suffer a heart attack, without help,the person whose heart is beating improperly and who begins to feel faint, has only
about 10 seconds left before losing consciousness.



However,these victims can help themselves by coughing repeatedly and very vigorously.

A deep breath should be taken before each cough, and the cough must be deep and prolonged, as when producing sputum from deep inside the chest.



A breath and a cough must be repeated about every two seconds without let-up until help arrives, or until the heart is felt to be beating normally again.



Deep breaths get oxygen into the lungs and coughing movements squeeze the heart and keep the blood circulating.

The squeezing pressure on the heart also helps it regain normal rhythm. In this way, heart attack victims can get to a hospital.

Hemorrhoids


Hemorrhoids


HAEMORRHOIDS
Constipation is a common condition that affects people of all ages. If constipated, one feel that stools (faeces) is not passing as often as normally do, or one has a strain more than usual, or unable to empty bowels. Constipation can also cause stools to be unusually hard, lumpy, large, or small. The severity of constipation can vary greatly, which can lead to complications, such as fecal impaction (where dry, hard stools collect in the rectum) or fecal incontinence (where involuntarily leak liquid stools around solid changed stools). It could be because of enlargements of veins of the rectum. This condition is often called piles. Veins in the rectum are of two sets, the internal veins line the lower rectum and extend upwards and the external veins lie beneath the skin at the anus (rectal opening). When any of these veins dilate (enlarge), they become hemorrhoids. Any condition that causes prolonged or repeated increase in the blood pressure in the rectal veins may give to the process of hemorrhoids. Such conditions may include constipation, pregnancy, and long periods of standing.
Hemorrhoids of the external veins usually cause little discomfort unless a blood clot forms in the affected vein and causes inflammation. Hemorrhoids of the internal veins may bleed or descend through the anus as a result of bowel movements. Such hemorrhoids may cause pain or itching. And the treatment for constipation the main cause of hemorrhoids is exceptionally effective through the concept Onnuri SuJok acupuncture.
Symptoms:
Constipation. Diarrhea. Mucus. Exacerbating factors, and factors related to the relief of symptoms.
Or bleeding: painless bright red bleeding is the commonest symptom of internal hemorrhoids, and often occurs with defecation.
Anal itch; Occurs with internal hemorrhoids, due to prolapse of rectal mucosa causing chronic mucus discharge and irritation of the perinatal skin. Soiling, which also occurs with prolapse, may cause anal itch.
Prolapse; It occurs with a bowel movement and is associated with an uncomfortable sensation of rectal fullness, incomplete evacuation, and a lump at the anal verge.
Pain: a rarely significant symptom of internal hemorrhoids, if pain strangulated: progressive venous engorgement and incarceration of the acutely inflamed hemorrhoids leads to thrombosis and infarction. External hemorrhoids do not usually cause symptoms unless thrombosis occurs, in which case they present acutely as a severely painful perinatal lump.
More Fiber and fluids in routine diet can overcome the symptoms. It includes fruit, vegetables, whole grain rice, whole wheat, whole meal bread, seeds, nuts, and oats. More fiber means bowel movements regular because it helps food to pass through the digestive system more easily. Make sure to drink plenty of fluids, to avoid dehydration.
Besides this, keeping mobile and active will cut the risk of getting constipation. Not only, regular exercise cut the risk of becoming constipated, it will also leave you feeling healthier, and improve your mood, energy levels and general fitness.
Treatment through acupuncture Onnuri SuJok is one such treatment, which is very effective to have CURE at all the three levels – BODY, MIND, and EMOTIONS. High effect: when applied properly, a clear effect is often felt within few sessions, some time even one session. High effect-on pricking 1mm small micro tiny needles on hand to adjust the energy system of body or with small magnets similar to pulse size to put on fingers only. Thus, it can give effectiveness to have CURE of hemorrhoids.
The remission of the disease can be achieved and medicament’s therapy simultaneously can be reduced or eliminated altogether. The course of treatment is definitely uneventful. Try!
smile notion: onnurimedicine.wordpress.com ‘Dr.Dinesh kapur’

For constipation


For constipation


1. Eat only rice with a lot of leafy veg.

2. Take isbgol poweder one spoon in the night after or before the meal.

3. Drink as much water as you can, but not during the meal.

4. First thing after waking up have at least 1.25 litre of water before brushing
your teeth. (Water therapy)

5. Don't take maida and its products. Avoid chapatis too for a few days.

6. Take lots of fruits except sour ones.

7. Do some exercise related to internal organs.

8. If possible go for enemas for a few days (Naturopathy)

8. Go for water fast at least for a day in a week.

9. Don't take any allopathic medicine.

BRAIN DAMAGING HABITS


BRAIN DAMAGING HABITS



1. No Breakfast

People who do not take breakfast are going to have a lower blood sugar level. This leads to an insufficient supply of nutrients to the brain causing brain degeneration.

2 . Overeating

It causes hardening of the brain arteries, leading to a decrease in mental power.

3. Smoking

It causes multiple brain shrinkage and may lead to Alzheimer disease.

4. High Sugar consumption

Too much sugar will interrupt the absorption of proteins and nutrients causing malnutrition and may interfere with brain development.

5. Air Pollution

The brain is the largest oxygen consumer in our 20 body. Inhaling polluted air decreases the supply of oxygen to the brain, bringing about a decrease in brain efficiency.

6 . Sleep Deprivation

Sleep allows our brain to rest.. Long term deprivation from sleep will accelerate the death of brain cells..

7. Head covered while sleeping

Sleeping with the head covered increases the concentration of carbon dioxide and decrease concentration of oxygen that may lead to brain damaging effects.

8. Working your brain during illness

Working hard or studying with sickness may lead to a decrease in effectiveness of the brain as well as damage the brain.

9. Lacking in stimulating thoughts

Thinking is the best way to train our brain, lacking in brain stimulation thoughts may cause brain shrinkage.

10. Talking Rarely

Intellectual conversations will promote the efficiency of the brain

The Dangers of Aspartame--A sugar Free Item


The Dangers of Aspartame



Aug 27, 2010 Jaleesa Dorsey


Used in many well known sugarless brands, diet foods and sports drinks, aspartame is a calorie free sugar substitute. But what danger does it pose?
Aspartame, as defined by Dictionary.com, is an artificial sweetener produced from aspartic acid. It’s used in over 6,000 products that the average person consumes everyday such as soft drinks, candy, sports drinks, sugar free chewing gum, and even medicine, but what does anyone really know about this artificial sweetener?

What is Aspartame Made of?

There are three major components, aspartame includes 50% phenylalanine, an essential amino acid, 40% of aspartic acid, a nonessential amino acid, and 10% methanol, also called methyl alcohol or wood alcohol.

Methanol is a colorless poisonous liquid compound used as a solvent and fuel, but when ingested methanol breaks down to formaldehyde a chemical naturally found in the brain, but in excessive amounts it can be extremely dangerous. Although methanol can be found in some vegetables, the compounds ethanol and pectin are also found, which prevent methanol from turning into formaldehyde when ingested while aspartame does not.


How did Aspartame Gained FDA Approval?

G.D. Searle the maker of aspartame applied for approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 1975, but was denied with a stay being placed on the approval of aspartame by the commissioner of the FDA for 15 years. After that a G.D. Searle(a company purchased by Monsanto manufacturer of aspartame) CEO, named Donald Rumsfeld, in one Searle meeting vowed to “call his markers” to get aspartame approved.

About twenty days later, when Ronald Regan took office, Arthur Hull Hayes, a friend of Donald Rumsfeld, was appointed the new FDA commissioner, in 1981, Arthur Hayes then proceeded to appoint a 5-person Scientific Commissions team to review the board‘s inquiry decision. Even so, it soon became clear that the Scientific Commission, by a vote of 3 to 2, would uphold the ban on aspartame. Hayes then moved to appoint a 6th member on the commission board and the voting became deadlocked in a draw, Hayes personally broke the tie in Monsanto’s favor.

Sometime after aspartame gained FDA approval, Hayes found himself under investigation by the FDA for allegations of impropriety and stepped down from his position as FDA commissioner then he went on to serve briefly as Provost at New York Medical College, after leaving the Medical College, he accepted a position with Burston-Marsteller, the chief of public relations for Monsanto and G.D. Searle.



The Side Effects of Aspartame

This artificial sweetener has been known to cause many side effects such as problems with vision and breathing, seizures, brain tumors, and even serious pregnancy complications among other side effects. A study released by the Department of Health and Human Services showed a significant increase in malignant tumors and different forms of cancer in rats that were exposed to various levels of aspartame in their feed.

The dangers of aspartame are not to but taken lightly, over the years many serious side effects of aspartame have been discovered by the Department of Health and Human Resources, as well as other studies show that this calorie free artificial sweetener does more harm than good.

How Much safe Is Microwave Cooking


How Much safe Is Microwave Cooking


Dr. Hans Ulrich Hertel, who is now retired, worked as a food scientist for many years with one of the major Swiss food companies that do business on a global scale.

A few years ago, he was fired from his job for questioning certain processing procedures that denatured the food.


In 1991, he and a Lausanne University professor published a research paper indicating that food cooked in microwave ovens could pose a greater risk to health than food cooked by conventional means.

An article also appeared in issue 19 of the Journal Franz Weber in which it was stated that the consumption of food cooked in microwave ovens had cancerous effects on the blood.

The research paper itself followed the article.

On the cover of the magazine there was a picture of the Grim Reaper holding a microwave oven in one of his hands.



Dr. Hertel was the first scientist to conceive and carry out a quality clinical study on the effects microwaved nutrients have on the blood and physiology of the human body.

His small but well controlled study showed the degenerative force produced in microwave ovens and the food processed in them.

The scientific conclusion showed that microwave cooking changed the nutrients in the food; and, changes took place in the participants' blood that could cause deterioration in the human system.

Hertel's scientific study was done along with Dr. Bernard H. Blanc of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and the University Institute for Biochemistry.


In intervals of two to five days, the volunteers in the study received one of the following food variants on an empty stomach:

Raw milk;

The same milk conventionally cooked;

Pasteurized milk;

The same raw milks cooked in a microwave oven;

Raw vegetables from an organic farm; (6) the same vegetables cooked conventionally;

The same vegetables frozen and defrosted in a microwave oven; and

The same vegetables cooked in the microwave oven.


Once the volunteers were isolated, blood samples were taken from every volunteer immediately before eating.

Then, blood samples were taken at defined intervals after eating from the above milk or vegetable preparations.



Significant changes were discovered in the blood samples from the intervals following the foods cooked in the microwave oven.

These changes included a decrease in all hemoglobin and cholesterol values, especially the ratio of HDL (good cholesterol) and LDL (bad cholesterol) values.

Lymphocytes (white blood cells) showed a more distinct short-term decrease following the intake of microwaved food than after the intake of all the other variants.

Each of these indicators pointed to degeneration.

Additionally, there was a highly significant association between the amount of microwave energy in the test foods and the luminous power of luminescent bacteria exposed to serum from test persons who ate that food.

This led Dr. Hertel to the conclusion that such technically derived energies may, indeed, be passed along to man inductively via eating microwaved food.



According to Dr. Hertel,

"Leukocytosis, which cannot be accounted for by normal daily deviations, is taken very seriously by hemotologists.

Leukocytes are often signs of pathogenic effects on the living system, such as poisoning and cell damage.

The increase of leukocytes with the microwaved foods were more pronounced than with all the other variants.

It appears that these marked increases were caused entirely by ingesting the microwaved substances.

This process is based on physical principles and has already been confirmed in the literature.

The apparent additional energy exhibited by the luminescent bacteria was merely an extra confirmation.

There is extensive scientific literature concerning the hazardous effects of direct microwave radiation on living systems.

It is astonishing, therefore, to realize how little effort has been taken to replace this detrimental technique of microwaves with technology more in accordance with nature.

Technically produced microwaves are based on the principle of alternating current.

Atoms, molecules, and cells hit by this hard electromagnetic radiation are forced to reverse polarity 1-100 billion times a second.

There are no atoms, molecules or cells of any organic system able to withstand such a violent, destructive power for any extended period of time, not even in the low energy range of milliwatts.

Of all the natural substances - which are polar - the oxygen of water molecules reacts most sensitively.

This is how microwave cooking heat is generated - friction from this violence in water molecules.

Structures of molecules are torn apart, molecules are forcefully deformed, called structural isomerism, and thus become impaired in quality.

This is contrary to conventional heating of food where heat transfers convectionally from without to within.

Cooking by microwaves begins within the cells and molecules where water is present and where the energy is transformed into frictional heat.

In addition to the violent frictional heat effects, called thermic effects, there are also athermic effects which have hardly ever been taken into account.

These athermic effects are not presently measurable, but they can also deform the structures of molecules and have qualitative consequences.

For example the weakening of cell membranes by microwaves is used in the field of gene altering technology.

Because of the force involved, the cells are actually broken, thereby neutralizing the electrical potentials, the very life of the cells, between the outer and inner side of the cell membranes.

Impaired cells become easy prey for viruses, fungi and other microorganisms.

The natural repair mechanisms are suppressed and cells are forced to adapt to a state of energy emergency - they switch from aerobic to anaerobic respiration.

Instead of water and carbon dioxide, the cell poisons hydrogen peroxide and carbon monoxide are produced."




The same violent deformations that occur in our bodies, when we are directly exposed to radar or microwaves, also occur in the molecules of foods cooked in a microwave oven.

This radiation results in the destruction and deformation of food molecules.

Microwaving also creates new compounds, called radiolytic compounds, which are unknown fusions not found in nature.

Radiolytic compounds are created by molecular decomposition - decay - as a direct result of radiation.

Microwave oven manufacturers insist that microwaved and irradiated foods do not have any significantly higher radiolytic compounds than do broiled, baked or other conventionally cooked foods.

The scientific clinical evidence presented here has shown that this is simply a lie.

In America, neither universities nor the federal government have conducted any tests concerning the effects on our bodies from eating microwaved foods. Isn't that a bit odd?

They're more concerned with studies on what happens if the door on a microwave oven doesn't close properly.

Once again, common sense tells us that their attention should be centered on what happens to food cooked inside a microwave oven.

Since people ingest this altered food, shouldn't there be concern for how the same decayed molecules will affect our own human biological cell structure?

Industry's action to hide the truth.



As soon as Doctors Hertel and Blanc published their results, the authorities reacted.

A powerful trade organization, the Swiss Association of Dealers for Electro-apparatuses for Households and Industry, known as FEA, struck swiftly in 1992.

They forced the President of the Court of Seftigen, Canton of Bern, to issue a "gag order" against Drs. Hertel and Blanc.

In March 1993, Dr. Hertel was convicted for "interfering with commerce" and prohibited from further publishing his results.

However, Dr. Hertel stood his ground and fought this decision over the years.

Not long ago, this decision was reversed in a judgment delivered in Strasbourg, Austria, on August 25, 1998.

The European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a violation of Hertel's rights in the 1993 decision.

The European Court of Human Rights also ruled that the "gag order" issued by the Swiss court in 1992 against Dr. Hertel, prohibiting him from declaring that microwave ovens are dangerous to human health, was contrary to the right to freedom of expression.

In addition, Switzerland was ordered to pay Dr. Hertel compensation.

MILK: WHO NEEDS IT?


 Nisarga Raman
Holistic Recipes - MILK: WHO NEEDS IT?

by Karan Verma

Throughout life, not a day goes by when we don't taste the ubiquitous milk in some form or another. We are convinced that it is a 'complete food' that takes care of all our utritional needs. Yet, is it really so? Is milk and other milk products really all that healthy?


"Milk!" The very word is comforting. "How about a nice cup of hot milk?" The last time you heard that question; it was from someone who cared for you. In fact, the entire matter of food, especially milk, is surrounded with a great deal of emotional and cultural conditioning. More so in India because we revere Lord Krishna who was a cowherd in his childhood.

"I grew up with the ayurvedic wisdom that milk and milk products are essential, not only as nutrients but also because they have medicinal value," says Noida-based ayurveda researcher Dr Vinod Verma. "For instance, eye infections could be cured with human milk. When fatigued, there was nothing like a glass of fresh hot milk. Mixed with sugar and a pinch of saffron, it did wonders for your sexual health. Raw milk made for a good vaginal douche."

Milk is our very first food. In infancy, it is a link of love with our mother, and our only way to survival. As we grow up, mother's milk is replaced by cow's, buffalo's, or even goat's milk. We Indians are a nation of milk drinkers. Nearly all of us—infants, children, adults and the aged—drink milk. We consume several hundred gallons a year, and add to that milk products, such as cheese, butter, curd, khoya and sweets. So, can there be anything wrong with milk?

We constantly hear messages that assure us: "Milk is good for you." Our dietitians insist: "You've got to have milk, or where will you get your calcium from?" Nutritionists have also been harping for years that dairy products are an 'essential food group'. "And why not?" asks DR R.C. Bhasin, cardio-respiratory consultant at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital in Delhi, India. "Milk is nutritious and affordable. It remains drinkable for a long time, if refrigerated. Its nutritional value remains unchanged." DR Verma insists she consumes a liter of milk every day. But she's quick to add: "This is not the milk from plastic bags nor is it homogenized in any way. I get it directly from the dairy farmers."

What's the scare all about? "If cows or other milch cattle are injected with antibiotics or thirst-promoting chemicals to increase their milk produce, or they are fed on greens grown with artificial fertilizers and pesticides, obviously we are consuming these poisons with the milk," reasons DR Verma. "Milk preservation techniques play their own role and in the end, what we get is a harmful white liquid."

Not just cattle, that's true in the case of lactating women too. DR Verma says that ayurveda has specific instructions for the nursing mother to alter her diet if her baby develops any ailment. "Ayurveda treats the baby through her mother's milk. If the mother eats too much ginger, garlic, chilies or other pitta (heat) promoting stuff, the baby will fall sick due to imbalance. To create an equilibrium, we prescribe foods for the mother that have a cooling effect, like rice, fennel, coriander and bitter-tasting vegetables," she says.

Sunita Pant Bansal, a Delhi-based nutritionist and publisher, contends that many avoid milk believing it to be high in calories. "This needn't be so," she says. "Cow's milk contains half as much fat as buffalo's, and if you are scared of putting on the pounds, all you have to do is skim off the malai (milk crust) and you have a low calorie nutritious drink!"

Sunita informs that the average protein content of milk is about 4 per cent, yet it boasts of all vitamins, except vitamin C, in appreciable amounts. Milk is also a good source of calcium and phosphorous required for growth and development of bones.

DR Walter Willett, veteran nutrition researcher at the Harvard School of Public Health, however, doesn't buy Sunita's point when he says that calcium consumption "has become something of a religious crusade", overshadowing true beneficial measures such as exercise. In any case, green leafy vegetables and legumes are better sources of calcium than milk.

In an e-mail interview, DR Willett pooh-poohed the dairy industry's claim that three glasses of milk daily would strengthen our bones and rule out osteoporosis forever. He quotes The McDougall Program for Women, 2000: "The primary cause of osteoporosis is the high-protein diet most Americans consume today… both clinical and population evidence strongly implicate dairy in causing, rather than preventing, osteoporosis."

DR Willett argues that osteoporosis being caused by calcium deficiency is a myth created to sell dairy products and calcium supplements. "American women are among the biggest consumers of calcium in the world and they still have among the highest levels of osteoporosis." Who is right? Where best to get our answers? Can we trust milk industry spokespersons? Are nutritionists up-to-date or are they simply repeating what their professors learned decades ago? What about the new voices urging caution?

Writes Delhi-based naturopath and reiki master, DR Nand Kishore Sharma in his book Milk: A Silent Killer: "One shouldn't drink milk just because it has been favored by rishi-munis or the ancient sages. Seek your own truth by using your brains, common sense and all the research available on the subject today." According to him, milk is a maternal lactating secretion, a short-term nutrient for newborns. Nothing more, nothing less.

Moreover, mammals provide milk for a short period after birth. "When the time comes for weaning, the offspring is introduced to the proper food for that species of mammal," says DR Sharma. For instance, the puppy is nursed for a few weeks and then rejected by its mother so that it learns to eat solid food.

Osho said something similar three decades ago. "The milk you are drinking has not been produced for you. You drink cow's milk… it's for calves. After a certain age, no animal drinks milk, with the exception of man. To drink a little in tea, coffee is okay, but don't become a milk dieter."

Agrees eminent pediatrician DR Anupam Sibal of Delhi's Indraprastha Apollo Hospital: "Though I don't go by such rigid rules myself, it's true that after a certain age when a child can eat solid food, he doesn't need milk." He adds that many parents complain that their children hate milk even though they are otherwise eating normally. "It's well-established in the medical world that milk's got the goodies. Personally, too, I don't feel milk is bad, but if your child is getting all the nutrients from foods other than milk, it's all right," he says.

Agrees Sunita: "Milk is not indispensable. Once the child can eat other foodstuffs, milk ceases to be a priority. Individual milk nutrients can be obtained from other dietary sources. You can get your proteins from lentils, and your vitamins and minerals from fruit and vegetables," she says.

As for medical studies on intestinal colic, intestinal irritation and bleeding, anemia, allergic reactions in infants and children as well as infections such as salmonella and lactose intolerance, DR Bhasin says these are more of a scare than anything else. "Milk allergies are definitely there, but not as rampant as they are made out to be," he says.

There's more. It seems that nature provides newborns with lactase, the enzymatic equipment to metabolize lactose, or milk sugar, but this ability often disappears by age four or five. Lactose is a disaccharide, which is too large to be absorbed into the bloodstream without first being broken down into monosaccharides, namely galactose and glucose for which, lactase is a must.

Let's think about this for a moment. Nature gives us the ability to metabolize lactose for a few years and then shuts off the mechanism. Is Mother Nature trying to tell us something? Infants must drink milk. The fact that so many adults cannot might be related to the tendency of nature to abandon mechanisms that are not needed. At least half the adult humans on this planet are 'lactose intolerant', which means they cannot digest lactose, and so, milk.

What if you are lactose-intolerant but lust after dairy products? Is all lost? "Not at all," assures DR Bhasin. "It seems that lactose is largely digested by bacteria and you will be able to enjoy your cheese despite lactose intolerance. Curd is similar in this respect." Blasting another myth, he says mothers with asthma can breast-feed their newborns. "In fact, they must," he insists. "Also, cow's milk is definitely not a replacement for the mother's, but at the same time not all babies who are fed cow's milk turn colicky."

But is all milk the same? Buffalos and cows have been the traditional source of milk mainly because of their abundant milk supply. "Goat's milk is deficient in folic acid," informs DR Sibal. "But goat's milk fortified with folic acid is now available abroad."

But is it natural? Is it wise to drink the milk of another species of mammal? Consider for a moment, if it was possible, to drink the milk of, let's say a cat. Or perhaps of a dog. Possibly some horse milk. Get the idea?

Food is not just food, and milk is not just milk. It is not only the proper amount of food but also the proper qualitative composition that is critical for the very best in health and growth. Biochemists and physiologists—and rarely medical doctors—are gradually learning that foods contain the crucial elements that allow a particular species to develop its unique specializations.

Human specialization is for advanced neurological development and delicate neuromuscular control. We do not have much need of massive skeletal growth or huge muscles, as does a calf. Human newborns specifically need critical material for their brains, spinal cord and nerves. Can consuming mother's milk increase intelligence? It seems it does. In a remarkable study published in Lancet in 1992, a group of British workers randomly placed premature infants into two groups. One group received a milk formula; the other human breast milk, both given by stomach tubes. These children were followed for over 10 years. In intelligence testing, the human milk children averaged 10 IQ points higher.

It's worthwhile to note here that milk products are linked to all sorts of health problems, including obesity, heart disease and cancer. Eminent heart specialist DR Upendra Kaul, of SAARC Cardiac Society, is serious when he advises drinking skimmed milk for your heart's well being.

DR N.K. Sharma goes to the extent of saying that milk is the sole progenitor of a variety of diseases ranging from cancer and heart disease to gall bladder stones, artherosclerosis, even cataract and dental problems. Says he: "Milk is largely responsible for the human cells going crazy. This is because of the constant inflow in the body of growth hormones meant for promoting the growth of a calf, not a human being. Today, this problem is more acute because cows have become something of freaks. In an effort to get them to produce more and more milk for a longer period of time, they have been bred and developed to have overactive pituitary glands. This is evidenced in the milk they produce and the high amount of protein in it."

The scare becomes all the more real when experts tell you that dairy products are likely to be contaminated with trace levels of antibiotics, hormones, and other chemicals, including dioxin, one of the most toxic substances known to humans.

The late DR Benjamin Spock, in Baby and Child Care (a Bible for many on the subject), after recommending that no one consume cow's milk and cataloguing a host of ills associated with milk consumption, concludes: "In nature, animals do not drink milk after infancy, and that is the normal pattern for humans, too. Children stay in better calcium balance when their protein comes from plant sources."

DR Sharma offers 'nut milk' as an alternative to animal milk in his book. Nut milk is made from raw, unroasted nuts, and can also be turned into curds, shakes and butters. Nut milk can be made not only from cashews, pistachios and almonds, but also with sunflower, pumpkin, melon and cucumber seeds. DR Sharma is not in favor of soymilk, though, which has been a popular milk-substitute in the West.

So there. And so be it.
 ·  ·